Management Strategies for Cutaneous Toxicity From EGFR Inhibitors

March 11, 2021 by Zac Pitts MSN, NP-C

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy is effective for several solid tumor malignancies, primarily non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation and metastatic colorectal cancer. Although the agents spare patients from typical side effects seen with more conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies, such as nausea or vomiting, they do have a unique side-effect profile, including potentially dose-limiting cutaneous toxicity.

Pathophysiology

EGFR is also present in healthy cells, primarily those in the gastrointestinal tract and skin. In the skin, EGFR signals healthy skin differentiation and proliferation. When that signaling pathway is blocked during EGFR therapy, skin rashes can occur. In a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy to placebo, Ding et al. found (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.2236) that 66.5% of patients developed skin rash.

Presentation and Grading

Skin rash’s typical presentation is often described as acne or an acneiform rash with onset typically occurring within the first two weeks of EGFR treatment. The rash is more accurately consistent with a papulopustular morphology and distinct from acne altogether, lacking the characteristic comedone of true acne vulgaris, and acne treatments shouldn’t be used to manage it. The distribution primarily affects the face, chest and back. As the patient continues with treatment, nail changes and xerosis are seen.

Accurate grading of skin toxicity is essential in guiding management strategies and adjusting treatment doses. Conventional grading tools often use body surface area or require the counting of individual pustules, which can be impractical in a clinical setting, and they don’t have a way to account for the psychosocial implications of facial rashes. In 2018, Beech et al. published a practical approach (https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0187) to grading EGFR therapy rashes based on the impact on a patient’s quality of life, intervention needed, and the ability to continue treatment.

Management

Effectively managing skin toxicities is crucial to keeping patients on treatment and decreasing the need for dose reductions. In 2009, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network developed (https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2009.0074) its expert consensus on the management of skin toxicity with EGFR inhibitors. Topical steroids and topical antibiotics (e.g., clindamycin, clarithromycin) were the mainstays of treatment and remain so more than a decade later.

The ONS GuidelinesTM for Cancer Treatment-Related Skin Toxicity confirmed (https://doi.org/10.1188/20.ONF.539-556) the evidence for steroids and antibiotics and provided other strategies for oncology nurses to manage acneiform rash:

Beech et al. added (https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0187):

Patients with preexisting eczema should intensify their usual skin care routine, and those with active rosacea, acne, or eczema may need (https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0187) to be immediately referred to dermatology.

Beech et al. created (https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0187) a treatment algorithm to guide clinicians in preventing and managing cutaneous toxicity.


Copyright © 2021 by the Oncology Nursing Society. User has permission to print one copy for personal or unit-based educational use. Contact pubpermissions@ons.org for quantity reprints or permission to adapt, excerpt, post online, or reuse ONS Voice content for any other purpose.